Editorial, AI and corrections policy
Technology articles carrying the vibecodai Editorial System byline are produced by an automated editorial workflow. The byline identifies a system, not a human reporter.
How articles are produced
The system identifies a current technology topic, gathers live web research, drafts an article from that evidence, and runs a separate evidence check before publication. Articles must cite at least two collected sources and distinguish established facts from allegations or unknowns.
Sources and limitations
Source links are published with each newly generated article so readers can inspect the underlying record. Automated checks can still miss errors, source changes, context, or contradictions. A citation shows where a statement came from; it is not an endorsement of the source.
No fabricated reporting
The automated system must not claim interviews, attendance at an event, firsthand observation, a reporting location, or a human identity. It must not invent quotations, figures, customer counts, dates, publications, or source material.
Corrections and updates
Material edits update the article modification date. Corrections should preserve the original publication date and clearly describe what changed when the correction affects the article’s conclusion or a significant factual claim. Articles may be removed when their evidence cannot be substantiated.
Coverage boundaries
Automated articles are intended for general technology information. They are not medical, legal, financial, or safety-critical advice. Rumors must be identified as unconfirmed, and an article should not be published when the available source set is too weak.